New Case Law – Usupervised Visitation

On October 13, 2010, the court of appeals issued an opinion in Long and LeDuc (http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A142477.htm).  Mother appealed the trial court’s ruling that father could have unsupervised time with his son.  The court of appeals held that the record supported the trial court’s finding that there is no evidence that father presents a danger to his son.  The court noted in a footnote that “ORS 107.102 does not specify factors that guide the “best interests” determination with respect to a parenting plan.  Although ORS 107.137(1) addresses factors that are relevant to determining best interests with respect to custody, they are also material in determining whether parenting time should be supervised.”  In order to require that a parent have only supervised time with a child the other parent needs to prove that there is a clear danger to the child.

About Daniel Margolin

Daniel Margolin is a founding partner of Stephens & Margolin LLP and a Portland, Oregon native. His practice focuses on all aspects of family law litigation. Dan applies his litigation expertise to provide additional expertise when assisting clients with Family Law Appeals and Collaborative Divorce matters. To find out more or contact Daniel Margolin, visit Stephens & Margolin LLP
This entry was posted in Divorce and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to New Case Law – Usupervised Visitation

  1. It sounds like the Court of Appeals got this one right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *